Drastic's Future
- dsattorney
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:29 am
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:16 am
Re: Drastic's Future
Open sourcing would also open up the possibility of ports to other platforms where ad-ridden knockoffs wouldn't be as rampant, and a RetroArch core would do even more to guarantee that people receive the latest, official build.
- huckleberrypie
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 4:21 am
- Contact:
Re: Drastic's Future
That's the problem with an application marketplace as open as Google Play. Sure, the barrier to entry is low if you're an honest developer wanting to publish legit open-source software of your own handiwork, but there are those basement-dwelling kids from developing countries and shovelware developers eager to cash in and (over-)saturate the market with crap and more crap, just like what happened to Atari in the early 80s.
- dsattorney
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Drastic's Future
I have my methods to differenciate a fake app from the real deal. First:
"If the developer's name is different from the real app, it is fake."
Next:
"If there is obvious ortography mistakes in the description (most fake apps on the Store have this detail) then it is a fake."
And last:
"If the screenshots don't show images of the app itself, it is most likely a fake."
"If the developer's name is different from the real app, it is fake."
Next:
"If there is obvious ortography mistakes in the description (most fake apps on the Store have this detail) then it is a fake."
And last:
"If the screenshots don't show images of the app itself, it is most likely a fake."
OBJECTION!


Re: Drastic's Future
The medium Android user says instead:dsattorney wrote:I have my methods to differenciate a fake app from the real deal. First:
"If the developer's name is different from the real app, it is fake."
Next:
"If there is obvious ortography mistakes in the description (most fake apps on the Store have this detail) then it is a fake."
And last:
"If the screenshots don't show images of the app itself, it is most likely a fake."
"The name of the app is *Insert real app name*? So it is the real one."
A world with only experienced users or just intelligent ones is completely impossibile. And I don't think that this will ever get teached at schools
TETRIS FRIENDS IS DEAD
Spoiler!
- dsattorney
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Drastic's Future
OH COME ON! Everyone with a bit of common sense, which everyone has, can differenciate them! I don't even need to follow these guidelines!
OBJECTION!


Re: Drastic's Future
Yes, everyone can differenciate them. The problem is that they don't want or don't know how to do it or if it is necessary.dsattorney wrote:OH COME ON! Everyone with a bit of common sense, which everyone has, can differenciate them! I don't even need to follow these guidelines!
Like in the age when Softonic was used a lot, people download the first crap they find.
TETRIS FRIENDS IS DEAD
Spoiler!
- dsattorney
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:29 am
- huckleberrypie
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 4:21 am
- Contact:
Re: Drastic's Future
Reminds me of when my dad unwittingly downloaded Floppy Bird instead of Flappy Bird. Wouldn't those ripoffs be tantamount to typosquatting?SSUPII wrote:Yes, everyone can differenciate them. The problem is that they don't want or don't know how to do it or if it is necessary.dsattorney wrote:OH COME ON! Everyone with a bit of common sense, which everyone has, can differenciate them! I don't even need to follow these guidelines!
Like in the age when Softonic was used a lot, people download the first crap they find.
- dsattorney
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:29 am
Re: Drastic's Future
I think they do, cause two apps cannot have the same name on the Play Store, I think.
OBJECTION!

